Grid

In this piece from the Daily News, commentator Charles Moore explains why he thinks the recent AIMS study “Definitely NOT the Romanow Report” is a much more compelling and informative look at health reform than the recently released royal commission. As Moore points out, almost a year ago he was able to accurately predict the content and direction of the Romanow study: a recommendation for the continuation of a public, single-tiered, no user fee system with higher funding. According to Moore, these obvious and predictable conclusions “merely rehash(es) the prejudices and preconceptions that brought Canadian health care to its current difficulties.” This is why he is encouraging everyone to” download a copy of “Definitely NOT The Romanow Report” and check (it) out for yourself at www.aims.ca/Publications/Notromanow/notromanow.pdf.

In this piece, which has been reprinted across the country, AIMS President Brian Lee Crowley shows how what Roy Romanow heard from Canadians was transformed into what Mr. Romanow wanted Canadians to say – a skilful ventriloquism act. What the Romanow Commission heard from focus groups across the country was pretty much what Canadians have been telling pollsters for the last several years. Canadians are a down-to-earth, non-ideological, practical people. They're interested in what works and they're interested in real solutions to the growing evidence of the accelerating decline of the health care system. But that didn't square with the views of Mr. Romanow and his merry band. So they marched their focus groups into a room, and presented them with "expert opinion" to show these poor benighted citizens why the things they were willing to try were bad. Unsurprisingly, on being presented with what seemed to be an objective and authoritative debunking of ideas that had seemed practica

The day after the release of AIMS latest study, "Definitely Not the Romanow Report: Achieving Equity, Sustainability, Accountability and Consumer Empowerment in Canadian Health Care”, the ideas put forward received national attention as newspapers across the country focused on the innovative alternatives being put forward. In this article, Steve Macleod from the Canadian Press states that, “the Atlantic Institute for Market Studies, in a scathing report released Tuesday, criticizes Romanow for his role as head of a royal commission on the future of health care. Brian Crowley, the report's co-author, accuses Romanow of hearing only what he wants to hear, and ruling out many of the innovations that have vaulted several Western countries ahead of Canada in terms of health-care delivery.”

AIMS latest study, Definitely Not the Romanow Report: Achieving Equity, Sustainability, Accountability and Consumer Empowerment in Canadian Health Care, released today, was reported on the front page of the National Post this morning. The study, an alternative to this Thursday's widely anticipated Romanow report, concludes that Canadians must take more responsibility for their health and pay more for services in a smaller, more competitive public system. With the national debate increasingly focused on only two alternatives: increased taxes or reduced services, Definitely Not the Romanow Report will supply a broader and more innovative list of solutions to widen the debate and encourage thoughtful reform. To see the national attention being paid to the ideas being brought forward by AIMS, read the full piece by Tom Arnold.